PROCEEDINGS OF THE
STATE OF
) SS
Proceedings of the regular meeting of the Knox County Board, held at the
Knox County Courthouse,
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Janet Occhi and upon roll call the following members reported present:
District 1 Caroline Porter
District 2 Gayle Keiser
District 3 Janet Occhi
District 4 George Knapp
District 5 Gerald Link
District 1 Allen Pickrel
District 2 Greg Bacon
District 4 Wayne Saline
District 5 Ricardo Sandoval
District 1 Linda Roberts
District 2 Dana Shallenberger
District 3 Dale Parsons
District 4
District 5 Stephen Johnson
and those absent: District 3 Paul Hevland
and also present were James Thompson, Sheriff and Scott
Erickson,
Chairman Occhi led the members in the pledge to the flag and the Rev. David Scholl gave the invocation.
Chairman Occhi asked if there were any changes to the agenda. Chairman Occhi moved Item 11 up to after Item 2 on the Agenda. There were no other changes
Chairman Occhi asked if there were any public comment.
Mr. Bill Spillman addressed the Board regarding the BioDiesel plan to be
discussed at this meeting. Mr.
Spillman has written articles on BioDiesel and has worked in the lubrication and
fuels industry. He questioned if the
County should go into the business of producing BioDiesel or if this was an area
best left to private section businesses. He
also suggested to Mr. Larson that he should contact Dr. Honery, a professor at
the
Member Johnson motioned, seconded by Member Parsons to approve the appointment of Dr. Frank Peppers to the Knox County Board of Health and vote by roll call as follows: Ayes – Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes – (0). Motion carried.
Member Parsons motioned, seconded by Member Link to appoint Mr. Mark Kleine to the Civic Center Authority Board and vote by roll call as follows: Ayes - – Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes – (0). Motion carried.
Member Johnson motioned, seconded by Member Roberts to go in to closed
session to discuss worker’s compensation claims and vote by roll call as
follows: Ayes - – Porter, Keiser,
Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger,
Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes
– (0). Motion carried at
Motion by Member Mannhardt, seconded by Member Parsons to go in to closed
session to discuss contract negotiations and roll call vote as follows:
Ayes - – Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline,
Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14);
Noes – (0). Motion carried
at
Discussion commenced about the need for the Ad Hoc Negotiating to hire legal counsel. Member Johnson stated that we may be getting ahead of ourselves on this issue. He made the motion with a second by Member Link to table this item until next meeting and roll call vote as follows: Ayes - – Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes – (0). Motion carried. Member Keiser asked that when this issue returns that it be more specific in nature, and not allow the Committee to have standing legal counsel.
Treasurer Davis reported that about 270 of the eligible 440 employees have signed up for direct deposit. Member Bacon said he was handed a petition of over 100 signatures of County employees who do not like the Resolution. This is close to 25% of the employees and he also asked about a problem with the system. Treasurer Davis reported that there was a problem with the direct deposit payroll last week being sent to employees accounts twice by mistake. The banks were notified and the money was reversed back to the County. Member Keiser stated that she thought there was a request for this issue to be reviewed for legality. State’s Attorney Paul Mangieri stated that when the issue was before the Board before, he gave his opinion that it could be made a condition of employment for new hires or included in contract negotiations but would be hard to go back retroactively. His opinion remains the same now and said the Board has passed a Resolution that in effect says it is the County goal to have all employees direct deposit, but this can not be forced on to the employees. Member Keiser asked about the double deposits. Treasurer Davis said that they don’t know how the problem occurred but it was corrected quickly and in the 8 years the County has had direct deposit there have only been 3 problems. Member Keiser asked about the letter sent to some employees saying they were responsible to turn the extra money back over to the County. The bank gave the Treasurer’s office the names of the 4 people who had withdrawn the money and the banks efforts to retrieve it came back as Not Sufficient Funds. Only 1 person out of the 5 refused to return the money. The State’s Attorney drafted the letter that the employees received stating that civil action would be taken if the money was not returned. Member Keiser asked to see a copy of the letter. Member Johnson asked if the money has been returned yet. Treasurer Davis stated that 1 person was owed the money and all but 1 of the others has returned the funds. Member Johnson replied that if the employee has not return the money within the 7 day period referenced in the letter they should be fired for being dishonest. Member Keiser said that she has been given a whole different side of the story. She stated that the person has not been contacted directly and more accountability is needed. A Department Head was not informed or was the employee notified prior to the letter from the State’s Attorney being sent. They were not aware of the situation before they received the letter. Treasurer Davis said that every single Department Head and bank involved was notified of the situation and were to inform their employees of the situation. When the bank tried to take back the money from these 4 accounts it was not able to do so. Member Keiser asked if the problem may have been a bank policy and not the individual person. Treasurer Davis responded that the banks had no other problems except for these 4 person’s accounts.
Member Porter motioned, seconded by Member Knapp to join the United
Counties Council of Illinois. Member
Keiser asked who from the Board would be appointed to represent
Member Saline motioned, seconded by Member Pickrel to approve the Resolution on Transfer of Funds from Other Funds to the General Fund for Board per diems and mileage and vote by roll call as follows: Ayes - – Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes – (0). Motion carried.
Member Parsons motioned to accept the low bid from Office Specialists for
7 computers for the State’s Attorney and 1 for the
State’s Attorney Paul Mangieri updated the Board on litigation against
the County. The first case was Kato
vs.
Mary Davis business report was presented by Alan Hallberg.
The Home has not yet received any payments from the State.
They have not had to borrow anything as of this point, and Rod said that
the State said the payment should arrive the first part of next week.
Census at the facility is currently 34 with 7 of those from
Administrator Hallberg gave the zoning and Assessor’s business report.
The assessed values were mailed out on
Larry Larson started off the Landfill report with a report on the
advantages of BioDiesel over regular diesel.
These 2 items compete in the marketplace against each other and BioDiesel
has some big advantages. It is a
better lubricant and can be made out of plant oil, waste oil, or animal fats.
It is a renewable fuel source that can be used for heating oil and
vehicle fuel. It also reduces acid
rain. The Federal Government is
subsidizing BioDiesel at about $1.00 per gallon at this point.
We are producing about 70% of the oil production we were in the 1970’s.
With the way that the supply of oil going down and the demand going up we
could be thinking that gas at $1.80 per gallon as cheap in the near future.
We need to look into this item further and he asked the Board if they
wanted him to proceed then he needs some guidance from the Board.
Member Johnson asked if this program would be used for the County fuel
needs or if it would be a business venture.
He also would like to know an estimated cost of building the plant and
cost of a gallon of this fuel. Larry
Larson said he was looking at more than just the County needs and it might be a
Co-Op with other businesses. Member
Link said he would like to see Larry and
Larry Larson also informed the Board that the Landfill may need to purchase some transfer trailers in the future. Member Johnson asked if it would be just the trailer or would the tractor be needed also. Larson replied it would just be the trailers and hire the tractors.
Administrator Hallberg then gave the Highway Department business report.
He has sent a letter to Schrader regarding the request for road work in
The Nursing Home business report was then given by Administrator Hallberg. The elevator repair bids were opened and the cost was not as high as expected. The parts that we were told were no longer available would be replaced on the existing elevator. The Home owes the Referendum Account $268,000.00 which they are going to reduce with the Department of Public Aid money that was found and billed to the State. There have been some reorganization moves made at the Home. Discussion on the purchase of a new resident van followed a motion by Member Parsons and second by Member Keiser. The bidder’s information was included in the packet and Steve Goff has reviewed them all. Midwest Transit gave 3 bids and Southern Transit gave 1 bid. The last van at the Home was from Midwest Transit and that is what the recommendation is at this time. Member Bacon asked about what would be done with the old van. Hallberg said it would be kept at the Home and used for odd jobs or sold for sealed bids. Member Bacon also asked about the need for some of the optional equipment on the van. He was concerned about the lack of a spare tire cover and reverse alarm not being included in the package. Member Sandoval said it would be best to do some of this work while the chassis is being built instead of after it has been built. Member Johnson also said that the lettering package would be good to approve also. He suggested that we approve the motion to purchase and then give the Home Administrator the authority to add some of the extra features within reason. Since the delivery date for the van is 3 months, we still have time to add some of these features on to the unit. Roll call vote to approve the purchase of a resident van from Midwest Transit in the amount of $42,922 as follows: Ayes - Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes – (0). Motion carried.
Administrator Hallberg reported on the letter of termination to LZT that he prepared and reviewed with the State’s Attorney. On a motion by Member Pickrel, second by Member Sandoval to send the letter as presented to LZT a voice vote was cast as follows: Ayes – All, Noes – (None). Motion carried. Member Johnson asked about any additional billing from LZT. Member Pickrel said that the last one was for $125 and it has already been processed.
Administrator Hallberg presented the waste removal contract bids for the Nursing Home. Discussion about whether the number of containers that Waste Management would provide would be adequate for the need. He was also concerned about the charges for additional pick ups. Abingdon Salvage is picking up approximately 90 cubic yards per week currently. He wanted to know how much Waste Management would pick up before they charged the extra fees. Member Pickrel said they usually work on the concept that you are only charged extra fees if you have a special event or need that would require them to pick up an additional time. Member Link asked if Larry Larson would review the contracts. Member Bacon asked about a 3 year contract option.
The laundry service contract was discussed and information on the contract and water usage was included in the Board packet. The amendment to the collective bargaining unit was also included. The Home is saving money with this contract and water usage has been reduced by about 18% and salary expense has been reduced by 4%. Member Bacon commented on the savings stated was about $70,000 per year and we are not coming anywhere close to that amount. Hallberg said that those figures were provided by the former Home Administrator and that all but 1 of the employees affected by this change were reassigned to different areas. Member Johnson asked about the quality of work provided. Maryanne responded that the normal wear pattern is common and that they are doing a good job. She said that there were some bids that were getting old and worn and she has instructed the staff to remove these from service.
Member Pickrel motioned, seconded by Member Porter to disband the Ad Hoc Nursing Home Committee and discussion followed. Member Keiser stated that the Board approved to let the new Nursing Home Administrator look at the situation and give her opinion. Member Pickrel said that at her vision of what she would like to see done at the Home and goals to reach don’t require the Ad Hoc group input. Member Porter said the Ad Hoc group could be a hindrance and not allow her to act quickly when necessary. Member Mannhardt feels that the committee should stay because there is a lot of talent there and the advice is free. Member Parsons is in favor of keeping the committee stating that they are mostly a level headed group and have been a help to the Home. Member Johnson stated that the word Ad Hoc means there is a defined time for the committee to exist, and with the situation the way it is with borrowing from the Referendum Account the committee has done an outstanding job. We should thank them for their service and then move on without them. Maryanne stated that she does not like being put in the middle, and there are pros and cons to every situation. She feels it should be a decision of the Board. Member Pickrel said that the committee would not be able to give her any advice on her vision for the Home. She responded by saying that wherever her thoughts take her, she will always keep the Board informed and the committee was formed to help with the major renovations and not the day to day operations of the Home. At this point she is looking to just sprucing up the Home and not any major projects. Since this item has been tabled once before, the call for the vote was made to disband the Ad Hoc was made. The roll call vote was as follows: Ayes - Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Johnson – (13); Noes – Mannhardt (1). Motion carried.
Maryanne brought up the idea of a
County flag. This would be a good
way to involve the school children and bring pride to the County.
Member Keiser said it was a good idea and that maybe the Nursing Home
residents could vote on the winner. She
would like to have the County schools to work with the students to come up with
ideas similar to the Health Department coloring contests.
Member Johnson reported that the City of
Alan Hallberg reported on the GIS
policy and fee schedule. He will ask
for a vote on this at the next meeting. He
is trying to model the fee structure after
Alan Hallberg reported on the financial sheet he included in the packet. He also included notes on items he saw that were noteworthy. Member Keiser thought this was very helpful and would like to see more detail into the reasoning some items are not where they should be. The personnel policy comparison was also reviewed. The past practice issue that has caused concern in the past brought about this review. There are differences in holidays that are taken off, personal days allowed, vacation days allowed, longevity pay that is not mentioned in the County policy, clothing allowance, and sick days. He asked the Board for direction on how to proceed. Member Johnson stated that he purpose of this was to bring the non union personnel policies some uniformity. There should be fairness in the way they are treated. The Landfill only gets 1 week of vacation when the County policy is 2 weeks. But they do get extra sick days that the others do not. There should be one uniform policy that covers all non union employees in the County. Member Porter asked if it was a problem with the policy or of Department heads not following the policy. Administrator Hallberg stated that Larry and Dwayne had concerns about trying to get a uniform policy. Member Link stated that the Landfill is a hostile environment to work in and may require special exception. Member Parsons said we should set the policy of past practice aside and go back to the County policy. Administrator Hallberg stated that if they do change the policy, there will be some issues on lost vacation days, etc that the Board will have to address. Larry Larson addressed a memo he wrote to Alan Hallberg stating that the Landfill has followed the Highway contract even though they do not have a say in the vote. If we force them to go to the County policy, they will form 2 unions and not do some of the work that they do now. It is hard to get temporary workers to pick up papers and it may cause a lot of discord. Member Keiser made the point that this is looking at non union employees, but there are variations in the union contracts in order to try and bring some parity to the union agreements. Member Mannhardt stated that each department has different needs and we are now learning the various needs of the departments. We should not disrupt this process until we learn more about it. Member Link stated that when the issues are looked at in depth that the Landfill and Highway departments would be very similar in needs. Member Johnson stated that the Landfill “piggybacking” off of the Highway department contract could lead to other departments trying the same thing. Chairman Occhi directed the Administrator to investigate this issue further and look into the union agreements also.
Chairman Occhi presented the following consent agenda for approval: 1) Minutes of the Board Meeting held January 12, 2005; 2) Claims against Knox County, Illinois, for the period of January 13, 2005 to January 26, 2005 (ordering that invoices be accepted and approved and that the County Clerk and County Treasurer be authorized and directed to issue County Warrants in payment of the bills); 3) Claims by Members for per diem and mileage for the Meeting of January 26, 2005; 4) Financial reports of Scott G. Erickson, County Clerk; Robin E. Davis, Treasurer; Nancy J. McCune, Recorder; Kelly Cheesman, Circuit Clerk; and James K. Thompson, Sheriff; for the month of January 2005 (filed with the Clerk); 5) Sales tax and various taxes in for the month of November 2004 in the amounts of $82,839.45 and $23,627.82 and public safety tax in the amount of $72,182.17; 6) EPA fine at Landfill for $500. Member Pickrel motioned to approve the consent agenda asked that Item #33 and #37 be removed and voted on separately, seconded by Member Parsons and vote by roll call as follows: Ayes - Porter, Keiser, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt, Johnson – (14); Noes – (0). Motion carried.
Member Mannhardt motioned, seconded by Member Shallenberger to approve the claims against the County (Item #33). Chairman Occhi reported that the review committee looked at the bills and she felt that the pulled bills should be brought to the Boards attention before approving them. Member Link had no problem with the bills being pulled but the department heads need to be notified of the bills to be pulled. Alan Hallberg said he e-mailed Larry about the pulled bills. Member Keiser said that she thought the County had a policy to not pay for flowers and that it should be pulled. Larry addressed the cell phone issue stating that the employees use their own cell phones on the trucks and the Superintendent uses his own phone. We pay the truck drivers each $100 per year so that we do not have buy them a cell phone or install a radio in the trucks. This is a one time per year payment and the Superintendent gets an extra amount because his phone is used more. Administrator Hallberg has talked with other Administrators and they said that IRS codes require this money to be considered taxable income if no clear difference can be made between personal and work use. No other County has made this distinction before but other Counties do allow this. A log or record would need to be kept to be able to show the IRS that the calls were for business. Member Saline was worried that this would create a large amount of paperwork to deal with. Member Bacon stated that if the employee wanted the money then they would have to keep track of the time used. Member Saline said it should be the policy across the Board and not done on an individual basis. Member Pickrel asked if this was in writing that they would receive the $100 payment. Larson said it was not in writing. Member Pickrel then asked if the amount would be raised to allow for the taxes to be removed. Treasurer Davis said if you are going to tax them, it has to go through the payroll system and suggested that we should check with the auditors on this item. Member Saline said we will not be able to make a policy tonight, but we need to address this in the future. Member Pickrel asked Larson about the internet service. Larson said it was for his internet at the office, and that he does have a phone line his home. Larson was charging the bill to his personal credit card because of the late fees being charged. Member Johnson suggested that Larson talk to the Health Department about hooking up to their system. Member Mannhardt asked about the dental insurance payment. Treasurer Davis said it was for the payment of employees that have dental insurance. Member Keiser asked Larson about the purchase from Northern Tools on his personal credit card. Larson said the tool was needed for the work on the tarp machine device they are building at the Landfill and the County does not have a line of credit with the company. Member Bacon expressed concern about department heads using their personal account for purchases for the County.
Member Keiser wanted the bill for the flowers be removed from payment. Member Johnson agreed with Member Keiser but said that this was part of the Sheriff’s budget. Once we approve their budget, the Board does not have a say in the matter until they go over budget. Sheriff Thompson addressed the Board that they have done this in the past and if you are going to change the process then do it countywide. Member Porter said the elected officials have control over their own budget and it is not a large issue. Sheriff Thompson expressed concern over the Board micro-managing the County with this new system. A call for the question was made and roll call vote on the paying of the bills was as follows: Ayes -Porter, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Shallenberger, Parsons, Mannhardt – (11); Noes – Keiser (1); Abstain – Pickrel, Johnson (2). Motion carried.
Member Saline motioned, seconded by Member Link to approve Item #37 EPA
fine for the Landfill. Larson said
that he has not seen the bill in question. Member
Johnson asked if this was the fine for the surprise inspection that was approved
by the Board. Member Porter asked
why the owner of the Landfill is listed as the Landfill Committee and not
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
COMMENTS
Administrator Hallberg reported that on March 21st there will
be a risk management program on personnel issues and they have also offered to
present this same program on April 1st at
STATEMENTS OF
GENERAL CONCERN
Member Porter remarked that she did not like the way that Joyce Skinner has been treated publicly. Nobody knows more about the Assessor’s office than Joyce. She said that any Board Member that has a question can go to her office and ask.
Member Keiser wanted to compliment Administrator Hallberg on his presentation and liked his overview. She would like to have the Department heads to give their own reports before the Board.
Chairman Occhi and Member Knapp had no comment at this time.
Member Link commented that the packet was better and wants the efforts to continue on improving it. He also said that Administrator, Nursing Home and Highway all gave good details in their reports. He also wants everybody to work together and make this system work.
Member Pickrel stated that he has gotten a couple e-mails and said it is a nice way to keep informed on things.
Member Bacon said he liked the page number and item numbers in the packet. He was also shocked at the thickness of the packet and it was a lot of information to go through.
Members Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, and Parsons had no comments at this time.
Member Mannhardt agreed with Member Keiser that it would be good for the Department heads to give their own reports and presentations.
Member Johnson had no comment at this time.
Chairman Occhi reported that he
next meeting of the Board will be
Motion to adjourn by Member
Johnson, seconded by Member Sandoval. Voice
vote and motion Carried. The meeting
was adjourned at