PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNTY BOARD

KNOX COUNTY , ILLINOIS

December 28, 2005

STATE OF ILLINOIS )

                                     )           SS

COUNTY OF KNOX )

            Proceedings of the regular meeting of the Knox County Board, held at the Knox County Courthouse, Galesburg , Illinois on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 6:00 p.m.

            The meeting was called to order by Chairman Janet Occhi and upon roll call the following members reported present:

                                                District 1          Caroline Porter

                                                District 2          Paul Stewart

                                                District 3          Janet Occhi

District 4          George Knapp

District 5          Gerald Link

District 1          Allen Pickrel

District 2          Greg Bacon

District 4          Wayne Saline

District 5          Ricardo Sandoval

District 1          Linda Roberts

District 3          Dale Parsons

District 4          Lowell Mannhardt

                                                District 5          Stephen Johnson

And those absent:                     District 3          Paul Hevland

District 2          Dana Shallenberger

Also present was Scott Erickson, County Clerk .

            Chairman Occhi led the Members in the pledge to the flag. Darrell Hughes from Bethel Baptist Church , Galesburg , gave the innovation.

            Chairman Occhi asked for additions to the agenda. She asked for an addition to the agenda to discuss bill review and inserted that agenda item at 4A. There were no other additions.

            Chairman Occhi asked for public comments and there were none.

            Chairman Occhi presented for approval the following items of the consent agenda: 1) minutes of the Board Meeting held December 14, 2005, 2) claims by Members for per diem and mileage for the meeting of December 28, 2005, and 3) sales tax and various taxes for month of September 2005 in the amounts of $89,124.98 and $22,098.46 and public safety tax in the amount of $75,511.00. Motion was made Member Parsons and seconded by Member Roberts to approve these agenda items. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

            Motion was made by Member Porter and seconded by Member Parsons to hire a County Administrator in a year. Member Porter stated that in the meantime, someone should be hired to perform administrative duties in the County Clerk ’s Office.  Member Saline stated his opinion that he felt that hiring an administrator is a luxury that Knox County cannot afford. Five others Illinois counties of approximately the same size have recently released their county administrators. These counties have figured out that they cannot get their moneys’ worth out of a county administrator. One reason is because a county administrator has no legal right to make decisions. All that a county administrator can legally do is gather information, pass it along to the Board Members, and allow them to make decisions. Additionally, some think that hiring a county administrator will save the annual cost of $60,000-$70,000 spent on the salary and benefit package. Actually a county administrator does not save the County any money. We do not need to hire a county administrator. Board Members should be more accountable and do their own research to contact department heads or elected officials when they have questions. If we continue in this direction, we will be in the red, like other counties around us.

            Member Johnson stated that in lieu of the county administrator position, at least the County should hire an administrative assistant to work in the County Clerk ’s Office to help out with the preparation of the Board packets and assist in bill review. Northwestern University has a program designed for administrators. Perhaps we could get a graduate student interested in working for the County performing administrative duties. He stated the importance of having down on paper the specific duties and guidelines for hiring a county administrator. An ad hoc committee should be formed to establish guidelines. Specifics should be worked out in a committee over the period of time. What should be decided tonight is if we want to hire a county administrator.

            Member Parsons responded that at the very least an administrative assistant should be hired for the County Clerk ’s Office. Preferably this individual would be a graduate student and someone interested in the County’s business. We need someone to help us out who would gradually assume more responsibilities. Member Sandoval agreed with the Ad Hoc Committee idea.

            Regarding salary, Member Pickrel stated that the county administrator should not be paid more than elected officials. We need an organizer and facilitator. One of the duties should be to set up centralized purchasing. However, we need to scale down our expectations and the salary.

            Some Board Members expressed concerns about the proposed time line of a year. Member Pickrel suggested the possibility of hiring someone for the County Clerk ’s Office and tabling the matter of hiring a county administrator. Member Johnson reminded Members that the County is running a $33,000,000 business and it needs a CEO to run it effectively and efficiently. Since it is not her job, the County needs someone other than the Chairman of this Board to oversee the day to day operations. In the future we may not have a chairman who can devote the time that this chairman has.

            Member Saline spoke in favor of hiring an employee to work in the County Clerk ’s Office, with the Clerk defining what those duties would be. Additionally, we should form an ad hoc committee to hire an administrative assistant and determine the job description. Member Porter added that four years ago a job description was prepared which contains specific duties. Roll call vote on the motion to hire an administrator in a year is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, and Stewart—(2). Noes—Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(11). Motion was defeated.

            Motion was made by Member Pickrel and seconded by Member Knapp to form an ad hoc committee to look into guidelines to establish the workload for an administrative assistant. This is not to be confused with the person to be hired to assist in the County Clerk ’s Office as these are two separate issues. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried. Member Bacon encouraged County Clerk Scott Erickson to proceed with hiring someone for that office.

            Chairman Occhi introduced for discussion the process of reviewing the bills. She reported that earlier that week there had been an informal meeting scheduled for Members to review the bills. However, at this informal meeting only two Members showed up and that doesn’t add up to a quorum. The press was notified and minutes were taken which are on file in the County Clerk ’s Office. State’s Attorney Paul Mangieri stated that in order to comply with the Open Meetings Act a majority of the quorum of this Board would equal five Members present. Chairman Occhi recalled the previous meeting’s discussion to continue to meet as a committee of the whole, and bill review was listed as an area where improvements could be made. She sought input from the Board about how they wanted to review the bills. After much discussion, it was decided to continue with the current arrangement of reviewing bills from the information provided in the Member packets and reviewing the actual bills before each scheduled meeting. Questions can still be asked of department heads.

            Motion was made by Member Saline and seconded by Member Pickrel to approve the amended resolution to increase the court automation fee from $5.00 to $10.00 for the Circuit Clerk’s Office which would exempt fees paid on traffic, ordinance, and conservation offenses over the counter. Voice vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

            Motion was made by Member Parsons and seconded by Member Johnson to approve the amended resolution to increase the document storage fee from $5.00 to $10.00 for the Circuit Clerk’s Office which would exempt fees paid on traffic, ordinance, and conservation offenses over the counter, Voice vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

            County Treasurer Robin Davis presented the year end financial report and distributed to Members the 4th quarter report. For the year the County received $233,000 more in interest than in the previous year. In part this is because interest rates are beginning to go up. She also presented copies of the new budget to the Members. Last year the County received $6,339,000 in tax revenue. However, we had budgeted for $7,100,000. The difference is because of the decline of equalized assessed evaluation. There are over 13 taxing bodies and 39 funds. Overall in looking at just the general fund as an example, the revenue over expenses is $2,700. This is particularly outstanding as the Federal prisoners owe the County 5 months’ worth of money, which is about $200,000. Outstanding grant money amounts to about $20,000. Considering how much money was lost in tax revenue and the economy, she thinks that everyone is doing an outstanding job. One positive thing to note is that the County did receive more tax money from the State than was anticipated.

            The Mary Davis Home had an exceptional year especially considering that they are four months behind receiving their State revenue. Originally they budgeted for a $295,000 deficit and yet finished the year with a positive balance of $120,000. The Veterans started getting Social Security reimbursements and completed the year with a positive balance of $20,000. The Nursing Home recorded a $405,000 positive balance. In part this is due to the successful collection of old debt. There were also other funds in which originally deficits were written and yet they completed the year with positive balances.

            In summarizing the financial report she stated that although $234,000 was budgeted as a positive balance, the actual year end balance is $2,700,000. Some of this is because of one time things, but overall she feels that the elected officials and department heads do not get the credit that they deserve. We must all continue to be financially responsible.

            Motion was made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Parsons to remove from the table the gas bids for the County. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

            Motion was made by Member Saline and seconded by Member Link to accept the bid from The Junction/Phillips 66 effective February 1- April 30, 2006 . Sheriff James Thompson said that two bids had been submitted. The other bid from Riverland FS, Inc. contains no actual fixed cost. He recommended accepting the bid from The Junction/Philips 66. The price would be 5¢ over cost. This location would be convenient for the County. The County’s fuel invoice will not include any taxes. This company will set up a house charge account for the County. There was some discussion regarding the use of cards and accountability.

Sheriff Thompson stated that it would be best if each employee was to sign a receipt and records should be kept by department and by employee. This plan could generate a couple thousand dollars in savings, compared to purchasing gas from the City of Galesburg . Since the County consumes 55% of gas purchased by the City of Galesburg , they feel that it is appropriate to pass along the administrative costs to the County. The related costs were not so bad when gas was cheaper, but as the price of gas has increased these costs have also increased. It is worth considering other options such as this bid.

There was also some discussion regarding the time line. Since it is still undecided about the timeline of installing fuel tanks at the Mary Davis Home, it seemed unrealistic to be able to set up these accounts by January 1; 2006. The target date of beginning in February is more practical. If need be, this bid could be extended. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

John Kennedy presented the animal control business report and stated that business was continuing as usual.

John Kennedy proceeded to the next agenda item of collecting $25.00 redemption fees for Knox County animals. He reminded Members of the information in the packets and the options that were presented. The drawback of the first option is that we might have to renegotiate the contact with the Human Society. He recommended the second option of requiring owners to stop by the Knox County Law Enforcement Center , pay the $25.00 public safety fine and be given a receipt to take to the Animal Shelter. The owner will still be required to pay all fees charged by the shelter. Option three would mandate that personnel stay informed of the fines and fee schedule.

He had spoken with Treasurer Robin Davis to set up the necessary accounts. For the time being there needs to be two separate accounts: 1) the $5.00 fee to go to the County’s animal control fund for administrative costs, and 2) the $20.00 fee is to go to the State’s Pet Overpopulation Fund. We are advised to put these funds in separate accounts and keep them until we receive direction from the State. Motion was made by Member Porter and seconded by Member Mannhardt to collect the $25.00 redemption fee as per the second option. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(12). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

Rod Cleair presented the Mary Davis Home business report. In November, they averaged 26 out of county clients, and billed out $74,000. They averaged 10 Knox County clients: 6 of those detention clients, and 7 program clients. A check for $99,960 was received from the State on December 7.  On December 22, another check was received for slightly over $70,000; so the State is trying to get caught up.

He has not moved forward on the bond issue as he doesn’t have a definite estimate on the purposed security cameras. Earlier there was discussion about a bond extension in the amount of $1,000,000. His best estimate for the security would be approximately $250,000. Included in the Member packets is an end of the year report.

Member Saline stated that it would be wise to wait a few weeks before proceeding with the bond. We want to make sure that the amount of the bond is enough for the proposed security cameras, fuel tanks, as well as servicing the debt. Rod Cleair suggested that an ad hoc committee be formed to address these concerns.

Joyce Skinner presented the assessor/zoning business report. She reported that due to the change in the season, building permits are slowing down.

The Board of Review is scheduled to meet January 23, and 24, for two full days from 8:00-5:00 p.m. Again this year Maytag is back to appeal their valuation of both the plant and the warehouse. The Board of Review will not deal with the Maytag warehouse as that property has been sold, and possibly not with Maytag’s plant. This could go to P-Tab. Other companies that are expected to appear at the Board of Review include the Market Street Mall in Knoxville , and Gunther Construction. They are appealing the value of the property near the overpass on Rte. 41, specifically that huge hole that was dug. Although they paid $108,000, they say that currently the value is only $540. They made their money on the dirt. Additionally, representatives from ShopKo, the retirement center in Williamsfield, Super 8 Motel, Knox Investment, (which really refers to the strip club), the old Eagle’s building, and the Hy-Vee store on Main Street will be appearing before the Board of Review.

Larry Larson presented the landfill business report. He reported the loss of a transmission in one of the older trucks and thought that it could still be under warranty. Also the tarping machine is up and running. They have about $14,000 invested in that machine besides labor. It should pay for itself in one month. Recently one employee at the landfill did retire and they do not plan to refill that position.

Motion was made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Link to approve the fluff contract with Behr Peoria, Inc. Mr. Larson stated that we only haul 50% now as the remainder is now going to Tazewell County. That facility says that they have one more year to remain open and offered Behr a better rate. Due to the current price of fuel, we can’t outbid Tazewell. When asked about what fluff really is, Mr. Larson responded that for example when a refrigerator is scraped out, fluff is the non-metal materials that are left over. In the case of an automobile, this could be the insulation, the seats, rubber mats, etc. This contract will decrease our anticipated revenue from Behr by $283,800 this year. He reminded them of the other fluff contract with Allied which expires next December. We haul all of their fluff. Since we won’t be hauling so much fluff, we plan to put that truck to use hauling other materials. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

Motion was made by Member Stewart and seconded by Member Link to approve the payment of clothing allowances and longevity pay for the landfill employees. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

Duane Ratermann presented the highway business report. One big project has been the box culvert in Elba Township . Last Thursday the top was poured. Then it will have to cure for seven days and then hopefully get the road re-opened. Additionally, they have been cutting brush.

Duane Ratermann presented for first reading the engineering services agreement with AMENT, INC for the design of an equipment storage building for the highway department. Member Johnson questioned the $50,000 price tag and whether any local contractors had been contacted. Mr. Ratermann responded that he had not contacted local companies for a design build. This company designed a similar building for Henry County and this company understands our needs. Member Johnson shared his opinion that we don’t need to spend $50,000 for a design bid, unless Mr. Ratermann feels that it is necessary. Mr. Ratermann confessed that he is not an expert on buildings or their design.

Mr. Ratermann continued that only 10% of the estimated cost of this building will be for the design. Member Bacon commented about the special needs of this building. This company can design the wash bays and other problem areas. One of the problems is the oil and waste that washes off of this equipment cannot be just flushed down the drain. Special measures must be taken and this company is aware of how to do this to reclassify these materials and secure the EPA approval. Other Members voiced the same concerns as Member Johnson that local architects should be given the opportunity to bid on this project, as well as concerns about the $50,000 price tag.

Mr. Ratermann presented a Power Point presentation to pinpoint their present location, and the purposed site of this new storage building. Their current storage building is 40 years old and has 7,800 sq. ft.; however, it has become functionally obsolete. A new building is needed to store and make signs, and to store equipment. The highway department has over $1,500,000 invested in equipment. As much as possible it should be stored indoors. Currently we do not have enough truck and trailer storage space available. Additionally, it would be nice to have a new employee meeting room/lunch area. Also, the present wash bay areas are in need of repair.

The new proposed building would contain 9,000-15,000 sq. ft. for storage. The plan would be to tear down the old building and replace it with this new building on the same site. The appearance would be similar to the building built in 1994.

Member Johnson repeated that Mr. Ratermann should contact local architects. Mr. Ratermann purposed forming an ad hoc committee for this building project. Member Saline spoke in favor of a new building; but stated that as much as possible that the services of local professionals should be utilized.

Motion was made by Member Link and seconded by Member Parsons to approve the 2006 resolution on county motor fuel tax salary. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Saline, Sandoval, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

Marianne Wiesen presented the Nursing Home business report. Although she had planned to give a Power Point presentation to preview the Nursing Home’s new website, there were technical problems and this was postponed to the next meeting. She wanted Members to see this before it is posted to the web.

Marianne Wiesen introduced for approval the review policy and procedure for facility protocol with the memorial funds for the Nursing Home. This policy is included in the Member packets. Earlier this year, the auditors suggested that certain guidelines be written and adopted. Motion was made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Porter to approve this measure with voice vote recorded as follows: Ayes—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried.

Marianne Wiesen stated also at the next meeting she will include the professional liability insurance report.

Chris Wood presented the GIS business report. He stated that he had completed the 14th township and was beginning the 15th township for the land use layer. He reported that last Friday morning one of the project files pertaining to the land use was deleted from his computer. He didn’t know how this occurred but was able to retrieve these files. There could be serious consequences if these files were lost. Several things hinge on this land use layer. Security continues to be one of his major concerns.

Member Porter questioned the accuracy of the maps that he had been preparing. Mr. Wood responded that if a client desires parcel lines and photos behind it, they should know that these documents are not recognized in court, as photos do tend to distort the image. There is an accuracy rate of 5-10 ft. The parcel lines are accurate but the photos may be distorted.

Member Pickrel addressed the security concerns saying that the tumblers had been changed and he didn’t see how anyone without a key could be entering the annex building.

            Motion was made by Member Stewart and seconded by Member Pickrel to approve the bid for construction of two walls for the GIS Department. There followed a lengthy discussion. Chris Wood presented his visual recommendation of the placement of two partition walls. Later this partition could be moved if so desired. Again he addressed the issue of security. He had sought bids for these two partition walls.

            Member Pickrel reminded Members that there is $3,300 included in the GIS budget for this kind of office related expenses. It would cost approximately $1,300 for these partition walls.

            Chris Wood stated that the combined cost of the partition walls and the office furniture would cost approximately $4,500.

            Member Mannhardt spoke in opposition to the original motion as half of the equipment is still unsecured. He suggested the placement of another small wall and door in the back.

            Joyce Skinner stated that their computers are not secured and they have had no problems. Some of the same information is on their computers. They do keep the door to the conference room and office locked. She wondered about air circulation around these purposed partition walls.

            Sheriff Thompson also addressed the security concerns. These things need to be taken care of. That door should be replaced and a heavy duty lock with key installed.

            Chris Wood stated that if the back door problem is corrected then the purposed bid of $3,263.44 which includes 65 inch tall partition walls, office equipment and a desk, would meet his current needs. He does have the necessary funds in his budget to make these purchases.

            Member Stewart and Member Pickrel agreed to withdraw their original motion. Motion was made by Member Pickrel and seconded by Member Porter to accept this bid from Office Specialist, Inc. in the amount of $3,263.44, included on page 60 in the Member packets, as recommended by Mr. Wood. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Link, Pickrel, Bacon, Sandoval, Roberts, and Parsons—(9). Noes—Knapp, Saline, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(4). Motion carried.

            Motion was made by Member Parsons and seconded by Member Roberts to approve the claims against Knox County , Illinois , for the period of December 15, 2005-December 28, 2005 (ordering that invoices be accepted and approved and that the County Clerk and County Treasurer be authorized and directed to issue County Warrants in payment of the bills.) Member Saline questioned the bills for the Alternate Defenders Offices. Dean Stone from the State’s Attorney responded that sometimes Judge Walton and Judge Stewart set those fees at $85 an hour. Anything higher than that amount is contested.

            Member Bacon questioned why there are three computer companies listed among the bills. County Clerk Scott Erickson responded that since we have hired this new company, 3R Cubed, we are paying them for the current services. Additionally there were some old bills from Tri-Lutions and bills for wireless internet services which will continue.

            Member Johnson asked about the bills that were passed around and not included in the Member packets. Chairman Occhi stated that these bills would be up for approval at the next Board meeting.

            Member Johnson questioned a Nursing Home bill from Metamora Telephone Company. Ms. Wiesen informed him that is actually for pagers for the maintenance department. Roll call vote is recorded as follows: Ayes—Porter, Stewart, Occhi, Knapp, Link, Saline, Roberts, Parsons, Mannhardt, and Johnson—(10). Noes—(0). Pass—Pickrel, Bacon, and Sandoval—(3). Motion carried.

STATEMENTS OF GENERAL CONCERN

            County Clerk Scott Erickson took this opportunity to give his appreciation for the poinsettia sent to his grandfather’s funeral. The flowers were lovely.

            Member Porter commented Happy New Year.

            Member Stewart had no comment at this time.

            Chairman Occhi commented that interested Members willing to serve on the ad hoc committee for the administrative assistant, or serve on the building committee for the Mary Davis Home or landfill, should let her know.

            Member Knapp had no comment at this time.

            Member Link echoed Happy New Year.

            Member Pickrel, Member Bacon, Member Saline, Member Sandoval, and Member Roberts had no comments at this time.

            Member Parsons echoed Happy New Year.

            Member Mannhardt and Member Johnson had no comments at this time.

            Chairman Occhi announced that the next regular meeting will be held on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 , 6:00 p.m. , at the Knox County Courthouse, Galesburg , Illinois .

8:28 p.m. Motion was made by Member Sandoval and seconded by Member Roberts to adjourn with voice vote recorded as follows: Ayes—(13). Noes—(0). Motion carried. Meeting was adjourned.